Knight Khonje APC Advisory
APC Submission Review — Send It Ready, Not Hopeful
A line-by-line assessor review of your Case Study and Summary of Experience, against the Level 3 standard your panel actually applies.
Reviewed by Knight Khonje FRICS · 30+ years assessing the APC · 1,700+ candidates assessed · Written report within 5 working days
Most candidates who are referred do not fail because they lack experience. They fail because their submission describes tasks instead of demonstrating professional judgement — and they cannot see the gap from the inside.
This review closes that gap before it costs you a year. You receive a prioritised written report telling you exactly what to keep, what would invite a referral, and what to change before you submit — plus a preview of the questioning your submission is likely to provoke at final assessment.
✓ Full Case Study review against the Level 3 standard — structure, argument, and depth of reasoning
✓ Summary of Experience and competency declaration review, flagging where wording describes tasks rather than judgement
✓ A prioritised written assessor report: what to keep, what to change, and the order to do it in
✓ A preview of the questioning your submission is likely to provoke at final assessment
✓ Reviewed personally by an FRICS assessor and panel chair
A straight answer, or your money back. If your report does not give you clear, specific, actionable direction on your submission, tell me within 7 days and I will refund you in full.
Your background, education, experience and work ethic may differ from others'. There is no guarantee of a pass, and your results may vary. This review improves the quality of your submission; the assessment decision rests with your RICS panel.
.